A Critical Appraisal By Kim Petersen April 16, 2012 --
Young Sam enters the living room where his father sits in a reclining armchair with newspaper. The plasma TV is on and the news is discussing the failed launch of the North Korean Taepo Dong-2 missile. Sam knows that the United States and many other countries also launch missiles and rockets, so he cannot understand why it is so terrible when North Korea does so. He pauses thoughtfully and turns to his father.
“Dad, why is the government so upset about North Korea launching a rocket?”
“Well, son, our government says it threatens regional security and violates international law.”
“Why isn’t regional security threatened and international law violated when we launch a rocket? I mean how would we have gotten to the moon if we hadn’t launched rockets?”
“Why so many questions? Have you finished your homework already?”
“Finished Dad. Our teacher taught us that we should ask questions and develop our critical thinking ability. I’m trying to do that.”
“Didn’t your teacher teach you to respect your elders? We have to trust our leaders because we are the good guys. We are fighting for democracy, and the North Koreans are Commies.”
“So being a Commie means they are bad guys?”
“That’s right, son.”
“So we can launch rockets because we are good guys, and they can’t launch rockets because they are bad guys?”
“That’s right. Just think, the North Koreans are wasting money on weapons while their own people are starving.”
“But I heard that we are cancelling our food aid to those starving people. Is that what good guys do, Dad?”
“Look son, if we give food aid to the North Korean people, their dictators will use money to build rockets instead of feeding the people.”
“Have they ever used their rockets against us?”
“No, but they might.”
“I learned in social studies that we bombed them in the Korean War, but they’ve never come over here and bombed us, so I don’t understand why they are the threat and why we are not a threat. I guess it is just because we are the good guys. If we launch rockets, it must be okay because we are the good guys. If they launch rockets, it is a bad thing because they are the bad guys?”
“Now you are getting it.”
“That must be the same reason we can have nuclear weapons but the Iranians can’t: because they are the bad guys, and we are the good guys.”
“Now you are thinking critically, son.”
Kim Petersen is co-editor of Dissident Voice. He can be reached at: kim@dissidentvoice.org.
This article was first published at Dissident Voice
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Are Koreans Jewish in fervent nationalism?
By Kim Tae-jong
Many Koreans believe that Jim Yong Kim will bring great benefits to Korea in case the nominee for president of the World Bank wins, shown by the heroic welcome shown to him.
When he recently visited Seoul, President Lee Myung-bak as well as Minister of Strategy and Finance Bahk Jae-wan and Bank of Korea Governor Kim Choong-soo met him to officially express their strong support while saying he is the “right person” to lead the World Bank.
Observers point out, however, that his success has little to do with Koreans and add that underlying the cheerleading by Koreans, there might lurk some aspects of nationalism, which Jim Yong Kim might not share.
In fact, upon his nomination last month, local media generated much-hyped anticipation that the nation will have a Korea-born individual at the helm of another international organization, another leader similar to United Nations (UN) Secretary General Bank Ki-moon.
But the question is, should such Korean-Americans be considered Korean, although they have American citizenship?
Actually, Jim Yong Kim is not the only person who makes Koreans confused about nationalities and “bloodlines.”
Koreans have a strong tendency to link an individual’s achievements with nationalism, especially true when it comes to those of Korean descent.
“I think Koreans are emulating the Jewish people in some way,” Lee Yeon-ho, professor at Yonsei University, said. “Korea’s whole population is so small and not many people have advanced into renowned international organizations.
So, they tend to support those with Korean descent, as shown in the case of Jim Yong Kim.”
One of the most obvious cases in such tendencies can be found in Korean-American sports stars such as golfer Michelle Wie.
Wie is an American of Korean descent, but Koreans seem to claim her as their own, counting her two wins at LPGA Tour as victories of a Korean golfer.
But sometimes, such an attitude is criticized by those who think that they are too nationalistic.
Time wrote an article about Korea’s collective guilt, when the Virginia Tech massacre took place in 2007, killing 32 people and wounding 25 others.Koreans, who were more shocked by the fact that the perpetrator Cho Seung-hui was a Korean-American, expressed a sense of public shame.
The Korea government even convened an emergency meeting to consider possible ramifications.
A candlelight vigil was held outside the Embassy of the United States in Seoul.
President Roh Moo-hyun expressed his deepest condolences.
However, international media simply called such collective action as defensive nationalism.
In an op-ed piece, the LA Times wrote, governments and ethnic organizations should not “endorse this sort of stereotyping.”
“Ultimately, though, any reaction that reinforces primitive notions of racial or ethnic collective responsibility is headed for absurdity,” it said.
“But the truth is that Cho was an American kid. He had lived in the United States since he was 8, and he was clearly immersed in the dark side of U.S. popular culture.”
Experts say that Koreans have long developed severe nationalism, which could have a negative impact in the global arena.
“Koreans tend to expand the concept of family when they think of Korean-Americans or other nationalities with Korean decent,” Kim woo-seon, professor at Sogang University, said. What’s more important now is to embrace those who become Korean citizens and live here as Korea is becoming more multicultural, he said.
Many Koreans believe that Jim Yong Kim will bring great benefits to Korea in case the nominee for president of the World Bank wins, shown by the heroic welcome shown to him.
When he recently visited Seoul, President Lee Myung-bak as well as Minister of Strategy and Finance Bahk Jae-wan and Bank of Korea Governor Kim Choong-soo met him to officially express their strong support while saying he is the “right person” to lead the World Bank.
Observers point out, however, that his success has little to do with Koreans and add that underlying the cheerleading by Koreans, there might lurk some aspects of nationalism, which Jim Yong Kim might not share.
In fact, upon his nomination last month, local media generated much-hyped anticipation that the nation will have a Korea-born individual at the helm of another international organization, another leader similar to United Nations (UN) Secretary General Bank Ki-moon.
But the question is, should such Korean-Americans be considered Korean, although they have American citizenship?
Actually, Jim Yong Kim is not the only person who makes Koreans confused about nationalities and “bloodlines.”
Koreans have a strong tendency to link an individual’s achievements with nationalism, especially true when it comes to those of Korean descent.
“I think Koreans are emulating the Jewish people in some way,” Lee Yeon-ho, professor at Yonsei University, said. “Korea’s whole population is so small and not many people have advanced into renowned international organizations.
So, they tend to support those with Korean descent, as shown in the case of Jim Yong Kim.”
One of the most obvious cases in such tendencies can be found in Korean-American sports stars such as golfer Michelle Wie.
Wie is an American of Korean descent, but Koreans seem to claim her as their own, counting her two wins at LPGA Tour as victories of a Korean golfer.
But sometimes, such an attitude is criticized by those who think that they are too nationalistic.
Time wrote an article about Korea’s collective guilt, when the Virginia Tech massacre took place in 2007, killing 32 people and wounding 25 others.Koreans, who were more shocked by the fact that the perpetrator Cho Seung-hui was a Korean-American, expressed a sense of public shame.
The Korea government even convened an emergency meeting to consider possible ramifications.
A candlelight vigil was held outside the Embassy of the United States in Seoul.
President Roh Moo-hyun expressed his deepest condolences.
However, international media simply called such collective action as defensive nationalism.
In an op-ed piece, the LA Times wrote, governments and ethnic organizations should not “endorse this sort of stereotyping.”
“Ultimately, though, any reaction that reinforces primitive notions of racial or ethnic collective responsibility is headed for absurdity,” it said.
“But the truth is that Cho was an American kid. He had lived in the United States since he was 8, and he was clearly immersed in the dark side of U.S. popular culture.”
Experts say that Koreans have long developed severe nationalism, which could have a negative impact in the global arena.
“Koreans tend to expand the concept of family when they think of Korean-Americans or other nationalities with Korean decent,” Kim woo-seon, professor at Sogang University, said. What’s more important now is to embrace those who become Korean citizens and live here as Korea is becoming more multicultural, he said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)